Views: 0 Author: Ocean Yang Publish Time: 2026-01-05 Origin: Ljvogues
As Ocean Yang, CEO of Ljvogues and a manufacturer supporting PFAS-free period underwear production for brands worldwide, I've watched this issue transform from a technical footnote into a make-or-break factor for brand trust. Recent lawsuits, independent testing revelations, and regulatory momentum have made one thing clear: for any serious brand today, a PFAS-free materials strategy is no longer a marketing bonus—it's a basic requirement for consumer trust, regulatory compliance, and long-term brand survival.
This guide provides a practical framework for understanding PFAS risks, selecting safer materials, verifying supply chain claims, and turning PFAS-free positioning into genuine competitive advantage.

PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) are a large family of synthetic chemicals historically used to make fabrics water-resistant, stain-resistant, and oil-repellent. They're often called "forever chemicals" because they don't break down easily in the environment—or in the human body.
Scientific and public health research has associated PFAS exposure with serious health risks:
Health Concern | Research Findings |
Hormone disruption | Interference with thyroid function and reproductive hormones |
Reproductive issues | Links to fertility problems, pregnancy complications |
Immune effects | Reduced vaccine response, weakened immune function |
Cancer risk | Associations with kidney, testicular, and other cancers |
Developmental effects | Potential impacts on fetal and child development |
The anatomy of exposure matters. Period underwear is worn directly against highly absorbent vulvar and vaginal tissue for extended periods—often 8–hours at a time. This intimate, prolonged contact creates a different risk profile than casual fabric exposure:
Vulvar and vaginal tissue has higher permeability than regular skin
Extended wear time increases potential exposure duration
Heat and moisture may increase chemical transfer
Consumers trust "period-safe" products to be genuinely safe
The period underwear industry faced a reckoning when independent investigations revealed PFAS in products marketed as "safe," "non-toxic," and "sustainable":
The Thinx lawsuit alleged that the brand's underwear, long marketed as safe and sustainable, contained harmful PFAS chemicals. The case resulted in a settlement and raised industry-wide questions about testing practices and marketing claims. [
otre Dame research detected measurable PFAS in multiple layers of many reusable menstrual products tested, with some levels suggesting intentional use rather than incidental contamination. [4]
Preliminary screenings showed that period underwear and reusable pads had the highest rates of likely intentional PFAS use among reusable menstrual products—approximately 33% of period underwear and similar rates for reusable pads showed indicators of PFAS presence.
Industry Reality Check: These revelations didn't just affect individual brands—they created category-wide consumer skepticism. Today's informed shoppers actively search for "PFAS-free period underwear" and scrutinize brand claims more carefully than ever before.
Many brands assume that simply asking suppliers for "PFAS-free" fabric is sufficient. The reality is far more complex. Fluorinated chemistries can appear at multiple points in the supply chain, often without the brand's knowledge.
Component | Potential PFAS Source | Why It's Used |
Waterproof barriers | Fluorinated coatings on PUL/TPU | Enhanced water repellency |
Face fabrics | Stain-repellent finishes | Easier cleaning, stain resistance |
Absorbent layers | Water-resistant treatments | Directional moisture flow |
Elastic bands | Processing aids | Manufacturing efficiency |
Thread and trims | Contaminated materials | Uncontrolled supply chain |
Printing inks | Fluorinated additives | Durability, adhesion |
Research has shown that PFAS presence in menstrual products isn't always intentional—but it's widespread:
Testing revealed that a significant percentage of pads, tampons, panty liners, and period underwear contained detectable fluorine, suggesting either intentional PFAS use or supply chain contamination [[4]
Some contamination occurs through cross-contact during manufacturing, storage, or shipping
Legacy equipment previously used with fluorinated treatments can transfer residues to new products
Brands have faced lawsuits and severe reputational damage not because PFAS caused proven harm to specific individuals, but because marketing claimed products were "non-toxic" or "safe" while independent testing found fluorinated compounds. [
he legal theory is straightforward: if you claim your product is safe/non-toxic/chemical-free, and testing reveals PFAS, you've potentially made false advertising claims—regardless of whether harm occurred.
Critical Insight for Brands: For private-label and OEM/ODM buyers, this means PFAS-free must be treated as a traceable, testable specification—not a vague checkbox in a supplier questionnaire. Documentation, testing, and supply chain control are essential.
Building a genuinely PFAS-free period underwear line starts with a material stack that doesn't rely on fluorinated chemistries for performance. Each component—face fabric, absorbent core, and leak-proof barrier—needs carefully specified, verified options.
The innermost layer requires the highest safety standards due to direct tissue contact.
Recommended Materials:
Material | Benefits | Certification to Request |
Organic cotton | Natural, breathable, hypoallergenic | GOTS, OEKO-TEX® Standard |
Bamboo viscose | Soft, naturally antimicrobial | OEKO-TEX®, FSC for bamboo sourcing |
TENCEL™ (Lyocell) | Sustainable, moisture-managing | OEKO-TEX®, Lenzing certification |
Modal/MicroModal | Exceptionally soft, durable | OEKO-TEX® Standard |
Key Specifications:
Request OEKO-TEX® Standard or equivalent certification confirming absence of harmful substances
Specify no chemical finishes (stain-repellent, water-repellent, antimicrobial treatments)
Keep elastane/spandex content minimal (typically 5–8% for stretch)
Verify that dyes and prints also meet non-toxic criteria
The absorbent layer must deliver performance through fiber structure and engineering, not chemical treatments.
Recommended Approaches:
Material | Absorption Method | PFAS Risk Level |
Microfiber polyester | Capillary action via fiber structure | Low (if untreated) |
Recycled polyester | Mechanical absorption | Low (verify source) |
Bamboo terry | Natural fiber absorbency | Very low |
Cotton/hemp blends | Natural fiber absorbency | Very low |
Viscose layers | Cellulosic absorption | Low |
Key Specifications:
Specify no PFAS-based treatments for water management or directional flow
Request documentation confirming no fluorinated finishes at any processing stage
Consider blended constructions (polyester + viscose + cotton) for optimized performance without chemical enhancement
The waterproof barrier is historically where PFAS problems have been most common—but PFAS-free alternatives now offer excellent performance.
PFAS-Free Barrier Options:
Material | Properties | Documentation Required |
TPU (Thermoplastic Polyurethane) | Waterproof, breathable, flexible | PFAS-free declaration from laminator |
PUL (Polyurethane Laminate) | Waterproof, fabric-bonded | PFAS-free declaration, coating specification |
Silicone-based barriers | Waterproof, hypoallergenic | Material safety data sheet |
Critical Requirements:
Obtain explicit PFAS-free documentation from the barrier manufacturer (not just the fabric supplier)
Verify that no fluorinated coatings are applied to enhance water repellency
Focus on mechanical and structural leak-proofing (proper layering, gusset design, coverage area) rather than chemical repellency
Manufacturing Insight: At Ljvogues, we've invested in PFAS-free TPU barrier sourcing and maintain documentation chains from laminate manufacturers through finished products. This traceability is essential for brands making PFAS-free claims.
Don't overlook the supporting materials that complete the product.
Components Requiring PFAS-Free Verification:
Elastic waistbands and leg openings — specify untreated elastics
Thread — verify no fluorinated processing aids
Labels and tags — confirm printing inks are PFAS-free
Packaging materials — some coated packaging contains PFAS

A credible PFAS-free promise requires more than supplier assurances—it demands systematic verification, documentation, and ongoing monitoring. Here's a practical due diligence framework for brands working with OEM/ODM partners.
Document Type | What It Should Cover | Red Flags |
PFAS-free declaration | All components: face fabrics, cores, barriers, elastics, trims | Vague language, "fabric only" scope |
Material specifications | Detailed composition of each layer | Missing barrier/coating details |
Processing declarations | Confirmation no fluorinated treatments at any stage | Silence on finishing steps |
Supplier certifications | OEKO-TEX®, GOTS, or equivalent for each material | Outdated or missing certificates |
Key Questions to Ask:
"Is this declaration component-specific or product-wide?"
"Does this cover all finishing and coating treatments?"
"Can you provide documentation from your upstream suppliers?"
Independent laboratory testing provides the verification that documentation alone cannot.
Testing Options:
Test Type | What It Measures | When to Use |
Total Organic Fluorine (TOF) | Presence of any fluorinated compounds | Screening, initial verification |
Targeted PFAS panel | Specific PFAS compounds (PFOA, PFOS, etc.) | Detailed analysis, marketing claims |
Extractable Organic Fluorine (EOF) | Fluorine that could migrate from product | Risk assessment |
Testing Strategy:
Test each layer separately as well as the complete product
Establish baseline testing for new suppliers and materials
Implement periodic verification testing for ongoing production
Consider publishing "non-detect" results to support marketing claims (as leading brands now do)
Many PFAS contamination issues occur during finishing steps that brands don't directly control.
Audit Focus Areas:
Water-repellent treatments (DWR finishes)
Stain-resistant treatments
Antimicrobial finishes
Barrier lamination processes
Equipment cleaning and cross-contamination controls
Elimination Requirement: Any treatment based on fluorinated chemistry must be identified and eliminated, with alternative performance solutions specified.
PFAS regulations are tightening rapidly, and compliance today should anticipate tomorrow's requirements.
Current Regulatory Landscape:
Region | Status | Implications |
European Union | Proposed broad PFAS restriction under REACH | Potential ban on PFAS in textiles |
California | PFAS disclosure requirements for textiles | Labeling and reporting obligations |
Other U.S. states | Various PFAS restrictions advancing | Patchwork compliance requirements |
Canada | PFAS assessment ongoing | Future restrictions likely |
Compliance Strategy: Treat PFAS control like quality control—systematic, documented, and linked to supplier selection and ongoing monitoring. Brands that build PFAS-free supply chains now will avoid costly reformulation when regulations tighten.
For modern period underwear brands, a robust PFAS-free strategy delivers both risk management and powerful market positioning. Consumers actively searching for non-toxic, eco-conscious options increasingly look for clear statements—and proof—that their underwear is free from harmful chemicals.
PFAS-free messaging resonates strongly with key consumer segments:
Consumer Segment | Why PFAS-Free Matters | Messaging Angle |
Sensitive skin sufferers | Reduced irritation risk | "Gentle, chemical-free comfort" |
Hormone-conscious consumers | Endocrine disruptor avoidance | "Body-safe, hormone-friendly" |
Fertility-focused shoppers | Reproductive health protection | "Safe for your reproductive health" |
Low-tox lifestyle adopters | Overall chemical load reduction | "Part of your clean living routine" |
Parents buying for teens | Protection for developing bodies | "Safe choice for your daughter" |
PFAS-free products support broader environmental messaging:
Cleaner water: PFAS contaminate water supplies and persist indefinitely
Reduced environmental burden: Forever chemicals accumulate in ecosystems
Alignment with eco-values: PFAS-free complements reusable, waste-reducing positioning
Regulatory future-proofing: Ahead of coming restrictions
The brands that will win in this category are those that treat PFAS-free as a trust-building commitment, not a marketing checkbox:
Trust-Building Actions:
Transparent testing: Publish test results or "non-detect" certifications
Honest communication: Explain what PFAS-free means and how you verify it
Consistent materials: Maintain PFAS-free standards across all products and production runs
Proactive disclosure: Address the issue directly rather than hoping customers don't ask
Competitive Reality: In an increasingly crowded period underwear market, "PFAS-free and proven" can be one of the most compelling differentiators your brand offers. Consumers who've read about the Thinx lawsuit or seen PFAS headlines are actively seeking brands they can trust.
For OEM/ODM-focused brands, achieving credible PFAS-free positioning requires manufacturing partners with genuine expertise in this area—not factories that simply check a box on a questionnaire.
Capability | Why It Matters | Questions to Ask |
PFAS-free material sourcing | Access to verified supply chain | "Can you provide PFAS-free declarations for each component?" |
Documentation systems | Traceability for marketing claims | "How do you document PFAS-free compliance?" |
Testing relationships | Third-party verification capability | "Do you work with labs for PFAS testing?" |
Technical expertise | Alternative performance solutions | "How do you achieve leak-proof performance without fluorinated treatments?" |
Regulatory awareness | Future compliance readiness | "How are you preparing for tightening PFAS regulations?" |

At Ljvogues, we've built our PFAS-free capability systematically:
Verified material sourcing: PFAS-free declarations from barrier laminators and fabric suppliers
Component-level documentation: Traceability from raw materials through finished products
Testing support: Relationships with third-party labs for verification testing
Technical alternatives: Leak-proof performance through engineering, not fluorinated chemistry
Ongoing monitoring: Regular verification of supplier compliance
The period underwear industry has entered a new era of accountability. Independent testing, consumer awareness, legal precedents, and regulatory momentum have made PFAS-free positioning essential for any brand serious about long-term success.
The brands that will thrive are those that:
Understand the risk — PFAS in intimate products is a serious consumer and regulatory concern
Control their supply chain — Component-level verification, not just supplier assurances
Verify through testing — Third-party lab results that support marketing claims
Communicate transparently — Honest, specific messaging about materials and testing
Partner strategically — Work with manufacturers who have genuine PFAS-free expertise
For brands ready to make the PFAS-free promise credibly, the reward is significant: differentiated positioning, consumer trust, regulatory readiness, and protection from the reputational risks that have damaged competitors.
As CEO of Ljvogues, I work with brands worldwide to develop genuinely PFAS-free period underwear—from material specification through production and verification. If you're building or reformulating your product line with PFAS-free as a priority, our team provides the supply chain expertise, documentation systems, and manufacturing capabilities to deliver on that promise credibly. Contact us to discuss your PFAS-free product development needs.

About the Author
Contact Us