Views: 0 Author: Ocean Yang Publish Time: 2026-01-06 Origin: Ljvogues
Choosing between OEM and ODM is one of the first strategic decisions every underwear brand must make—and it's a decision that will shape everything from your product uniqueness to your cash flow.
As Ocean Yang, CEO of Ljvogues and a manufacturer who has guided hundreds of brands through this exact decision, I've seen how the right production model accelerates success while the wrong choice creates frustration, wasted investment, and missed market windows. The key isn't simply picking one model over the other—it's understanding which approach aligns with your brand's current stage, resources, and growth ambitions.
This guide breaks down OEM and ODM in practical terms, helps you evaluate which model fits your situation, and shows how smart brands often combine both approaches as they evolve.

In underwear and lingerie manufacturing, OEM and ODM describe how design and production responsibilities are shared between your brand and the factory. Understanding this distinction clearly will help you avoid miscommunication, hidden costs, and misaligned expectations.
Definition: Your brand provides detailed designs, tech packs, or reference samples; the factory focuses on producing exactly to your specifications.
The relationship:
You own the design and brand identity completely
The manufacturer serves as your execution and production partner
You control every detail—patterns, materials, construction methods, trims
The factory's role is to manufacture your vision with quality and consistency
Analogy: Think of OEM like hiring a skilled contractor to build your custom-designed house. You provide the architectural plans; they provide the construction expertise.
Definition: The factory provides ready-made or semi-custom designs that you can brand and modify with your choice of colors, fabrics, absorbency levels, or detail adjustments.
The relationship:
The factory typically owns the base design IP
You gain speed and lower development costs through shared design investment
Customization is available within the framework of existing designs
Your brand identity comes through fabric choices, colors, branding elements, and packaging
Analogy: Think of ODM like choosing a well-designed model home and customizing the finishes, colors, and fixtures. The floor plan is proven; you make it yours through personalization.

In practice, OEM and ODM exist on a spectrum rather than as binary choices:
Model | Design Source | Customization Level | Brand Ownership |
Pure ODM | 100% factory design | Colors, fabrics, logo only | Branding elements only |
Modified ODM | Factory base design | Moderate changes to fit, coverage, details | Branding + modifications |
Semi-Custom | Collaborative design | Significant structural changes | Shared development |
Pure OEM | 100% brand design | Complete control over everything | Full design IP ownership |
Industry Reality: Factories like Ljvogues typically offer both models—and everything in between—allowing brands to mix approaches depending on the product, market opportunity, and development stage.
OEM is ideal when you want maximum design control and clear differentiation in a competitive market. It's especially valuable for established brands and those with strong in-house design or technical capabilities.
You have your own designs:
Your team can provide patterns, detailed tech packs, or physical samples
You've developed proprietary features (unique gusset structures, absorbency mapping, signature silhouettes)
You have design resources—whether in-house or through freelance technical designers
Brand uniqueness is critical:
You're competing on product innovation, not just price
You want silhouettes, constructions, or features that competitors cannot easily copy
Your brand positioning depends on "exclusive" or "signature" product stories
You plan for long-term volume:
You expect significant reorders that justify upfront development investment
You're building wholesale programs where product consistency is essential
Your business model supports higher MOQs and longer development timelines
Factor | OEM Reality |
Initial investment | Higher—pattern-making, sampling, custom materials, testing |
MOQ requirements | Higher—typically 500–1,000+ units per style/color to justify development |
Development timeline | Longer—4–12 weeks for sampling, approvals, and production setup |
Design ownership | Full—you own all patterns, tech packs, and design IP |
Differentiation potential | Maximum—truly unique products that competitors cannot replicate |
Factory relationship | Execution partner focused on manufacturing your specifications |
An established lingerie brand wants to introduce a signature high-tech menstrual boxer with unique absorbency zone mapping, proprietary four-layer construction, custom sustainable fabrics, and integrated sizing technology. They have detailed tech packs from their design team and expect to order 5,000+ units in the first year across multiple colorways.
Why OEM fits: The brand has design resources, needs true differentiation, plans significant volume, and wants complete IP ownership for their hero product.
ODM is built for speed, risk control, and efficiency, using the manufacturer's existing design library as your starting point. It works exceptionally well for new brands, private-label retailers, and cross-border e-commerce sellers testing market demand.

You lack design resources:
You don't have a pattern team or technical design capability
Creating detailed tech packs isn't feasible with your current team
You know what styles your market wants but can't engineer them yourself
You want faster time-to-market:
Market timing matters more than absolute uniqueness
You need to launch within weeks, not months
You're responding to trends or seasonal opportunities
You need lower risk and investment:
You're testing a new product category or market segment
Budget constraints limit upfront development spending
You prefer to validate demand before committing to custom development
Factor | ODM Reality |
Initial investment | Lower—shared design costs across multiple clients |
MOQ requirements | Often lower—300–500 units per style/color common |
Development timeline | Faster—2–4 weeks for sampling since patterns exist |
Design ownership | Partial—factory owns base design; you own branding and modifications |
Differentiation potential | Moderate—through fabrics, colors, absorbency, branding, packaging |
Factory relationship | Design + manufacturing partner providing proven solutions |
A new DTC brand wants to launch a period underwear line to test market demand. They have strong marketing capabilities and brand vision but no technical design team. They want to start with 500 units across three styles to validate their positioning before scaling.
Why ODM fits: The brand needs speed, has limited design resources, wants to minimize risk, and can differentiate through branding, marketing, and customer experience rather than product engineering.

This comparison table summarizes the strategic tradeoffs between OEM and ODM for underwear brands:
Dimension | OEM | ODM |
Who designs? | Brand designs; factory manufactures to specs | Factory designs; brand customizes existing styles |
Customization level | Very high—patterns, structure, details fully custom | Medium—fabrics, colors, branding, minor modifications |
Time to market | Slower—full development cycle required | Faster—based on proven templates and sizing |
Upfront cost | Higher—pattern-making, R&D, custom materials | Lower—shared design investment across clients |
Typical MOQ | Higher (500–1,000+) to justify development | Lower (300–500) suitable for testing |
Design ownership | Brand owns complete design IP | Factory owns base design; brand owns branding |
Risk level | Higher—more investment before market validation | Lower—test with proven designs first |
Best for | Established brands, unique concepts, flagship products | New brands, private-label, market testing, fast launches |
Strategic Flexibility: Factories like Ljvogues support both tracks, so brands can start with ODM to validate market demand and later upgrade successful products to OEM-level customization for maximum differentiation.
Your choice should reflect your stage, budget, design capacity, and growth ambition—not just short-term cost considerations. Asking yourself a few diagnostic questions can clarify the right path.
Question | If Yes → Consider OEM | If No → Consider ODM |
Do you have detailed tech packs or patterns? | ✓ | |
Is product uniqueness your primary competitive advantage? | ✓ | |
Can you commit to higher MOQs (500–1,000+ units)? | ✓ | |
Do you have 8–12 weeks for development before launch? | ✓ | |
Is this a proven product category for your brand? | ✓ | |
Are you testing a new market or product type? | ✓ | |
Do you need to launch within 4–6 weeks? | ✓ | |
Is minimizing upfront investment a priority? | ✓ | |
Do you lack technical design resources? | ✓ | |
Are you a new brand building initial product line? | ✓ |
In practice, many successful underwear brands use a hybrid strategy that evolves over time:
Phase 1: ODM for Launch and Validation
Use ODM to launch quickly with proven designs
Test market response with lower investment and risk
Gather customer feedback on fit, absorbency, and style preferences
Identify which products have strongest demand
Phase 2: OEM for Winners and Flagships
Upgrade top-performing products to OEM for differentiation
Develop signature products that define your brand
Create barriers to competition through unique designs
Invest development resources where market validation exists
Phase 3: Ongoing Portfolio Management
Maintain ODM for trend-responsive and seasonal products
Use OEM for core collection and hero products
Balance speed-to-market with differentiation needs
Optimize investment based on product lifecycle stage
Brand Type | Recommended Starting Model | Evolution Path |
New DTC brand | ODM | Upgrade winners to OEM after validation |
Private-label retailer | ODM | Add OEM exclusives for differentiation |
Established brand expanding categories | OEM or Semi-Custom | Full OEM for flagship products |
Cross-border e-commerce seller | ODM | Stay ODM for speed and flexibility |
Specialty/niche brand | OEM | OEM from start for unique positioning |

Regardless of which model you choose, your manufacturing partner's capabilities will determine your success. Here's what matters most for each approach.
Essential capabilities:
Technical pattern-making and grading expertise
Experience with your product category (period underwear, shapewear, etc.)
Ability to source custom materials and components
Quality systems that ensure consistency across production runs
Clear communication on timelines, costs, and technical requirements
Questions to ask:
"Can you show examples of custom OEM projects you've completed?"
"What information do you need from us to begin development?"
"How do you handle pattern adjustments during sampling?"
"What's your typical timeline from tech pack to production samples?"
Essential capabilities:
Comprehensive design library with styles relevant to your market
Flexibility in customization (fabrics, colors, absorbency, branding)
Reasonable MOQs that allow market testing
Fast sampling turnaround on existing designs
Clear documentation of what's customizable vs. fixed
Questions to ask:
"Can I see your current ODM catalog for [product category]?"
"What customization options are available on each design?"
"What's the MOQ for ODM orders?"
"How quickly can you provide samples of existing designs?"
Universal requirements:
Relevant certifications (OEKO-TEX®, BSCI, ISO, etc.)
Transparent pricing with no hidden costs
Clear IP and confidentiality agreements
Responsive communication and project management
Scalability as your brand grows
Working with a manufacturer strong in both OEM and ODM gives you strategic flexibility as your brand evolves. You're not locked into one approach or forced to change factories as your needs change.
At Ljvogues, we've built our capabilities to support brands across the entire OEM-ODM spectrum:
ODM capabilities:
Library of 100+ base designs for period underwear, bras, shapewear, and functional lingerie
Low MOQs (as low as 300 units) for new and testing brands
Quick sampling (2–3 weeks) on existing designs
Customization options: fabrics, colors, absorbency levels, prints, branding, packaging
OEM capabilities:
Full pattern-making and technical development services
Custom absorbency engineering for period underwear (10–60 ml capacity)
PFAS-free material sourcing with documentation
Unique silhouette and construction development
Complete design IP ownership for clients
Hybrid support:
Seamless transition from ODM to OEM as products prove successful
Mixed orders combining ODM basics with OEM flagships
Ongoing consultation on which model fits each product opportunity
The OEM vs. ODM decision isn't just about your first order—it's about building a production strategy that supports your brand's growth trajectory.
OEM delivers maximum differentiation but requires more investment, time, and design resources
ODM delivers speed and efficiency with lower risk, ideal for testing and launching quickly
Most successful brands use both models strategically across their product portfolio
Your choice should evolve as your brand grows, market knowledge deepens, and resources expand
Partner selection matters as much as model selection—choose a manufacturer who can support both approaches
By aligning your production model with your brand's current stage and future ambitions—and by choosing a partner that can grow with you—you build an underwear business that's not only profitable today but scalable and defensible for the long term.
As CEO of Ljvogues, I work with brands at every stage—from first-time launchers using our ODM library to established brands developing fully custom OEM collections. Whether you're testing a new product category or creating signature pieces that define your brand, our team provides the flexibility, expertise, and manufacturing capabilities to support your path. Contact us to discuss which production model fits your current needs and growth plans.
About the Author
Quick Links
Contact Us